Sunday, June 4, 2017

Confession #4: Summer classes... I can't get enough!!!

When I completed my Master's last  spring my husband sarcastically asked me what classes I was taking that summer. Laughing off his comment I assured him I was taking the summer off and enjoying the kids. Fast forward to last August and I had  taken a week long Orton-Gillingham training and started a 120 hour inquiry class. So much for the summer off right? I can't help it, I love learning about new strategies and techniques to use with my students. I'm addicted and I am also in love with inquiry-based learning!

At first glance, creating inquiry-based lessons can be overwhelming and down right terrifying! This type of learning completely changes the traditional role of the teacher and student requiring you to get out of your comfort zone. This style of teaching is not for the faint of heart folks but the payoff is well worth it! Just check out some of the positive outcomes: 

1. Inquiry-based teaching inspires students to learn more and learn more thoroughly.

2. An inquiry-based curriculum can increase student achievement and narrow the gap between high- and low- achieving students. 

3. Inquiry-based teaching methods can benefit culturally and linguistically diverse students and students with special needs. 

You can read summaries of the studies that support these outcomes here

I am pumped about learning how to create and teach inquiry-based lessons this school year. So far the class has helped me realize how misunderstood inquiry has become.  As science teachers we often equate hands-on labs with inquiry learning, however, the two are not equal.  Many labs will claim to be inquiry in hopes that using the latest buzzword will get you to spend your hard earned dollar, but they are inquiry in name only. Here's how to tell the two apart so you can save your cash for the real deal: 

If you can answer yes to most of the following questions you have a cookbook lab:


  • Does the lab require students to follow step-by-step instructions?
  • Does the lab focus on verifying information students already learned in a lecture?
  • Are the students provided the independent, dependent, and controlled variables for the lab?
  • Are the data tables provided that tell students what data to collect?
  • Are students told how to analyze the data? 
  • Does the teacher have to give a lot of instructions before the lab begins?

If you can answer no to most of the questions above, you just may have an inquiry lab. Here are some more detailed differences between cookbook and true inquiry labs.


Cookbook Labs:
Inquiry Labs:
Students follow step-by-step instructions.
Students are guided through experimental design. 
Lab strongly oriented toward gathering and interpreting numerical data.
Lab strongly oriented toward developing a strong conceptual understanding.
Student activity focuses on verifying information previously communicated in class.

Ongoing intellectual engagement using higher order thinking skills
Very little communication that tends to be one way- teacher to student
Discussion- teacher to student and student to student- driven by intellectually engaging questions. 
Students are provided data tables indicating what data to collect.  Data tables also provide the values for the independent variable.
Students determine what type of data and how much of it to collect, and how to concentrate data collection.  
Students are told which variables to hold constant, which to vary which are independent, and which are dependent.
Students are required to independently identify, distinguish and control pertinent independent and dependent variables.
Students are told precisely how to analyze and interpret data.
Students use their own approaches to analyzing and interpreting data.
Students are told what instruments to use and what data to collect with it.
Students have access to a variety of equipment and are responsible for appropriate use to collect pertinent data.
Conclusion known ahead of time.
Students use results to draw conclusions.
Rarely allow students to deal with error, uncertainty and misconceptions.
Commonly allow for students to learn from their mistakes and missteps.
Less time on task as students/teachers spend lots of time going over instructions.
More time on task as there is a very brief introduction and students create their own experimental design.
Lots direct instruction from teacher covering concepts.
Students discover concepts with their group.
Rarely requires familiarity with the concept or principle being investigated.
Requires students to become familiar with the concept or principle being investigated. 
Assumes understanding.
Constructs meaning.



If you're still unsure here is an example of a cookbook lab vs. a true inquiry lab: 









Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Semantic Feature Analysis



My teacher geek is showing lately with vocabulary graphic organizers.  I have been creating them for all of my inclusion classes to the point that I think my co-teachers are tired of seeing them. In spite of their annoyance, I was tired of the here-today-gone-tomorrow practice of memorize and match that my students have been doing.  So, I have been looking for ways to make them wrestle with the vocabulary a little bit instead of just memorizing and reciting.  My favorite of late have been Semantic Feature Analysis.  I was introduced to these little beauties during college.  A great resource for them is this book:

I'm fairly certain there are some newer editions of this text.  In fact, I think this one is sold as a collectible edition, which kind of made me feel old. Semantic Feature Analysis are great if you want to help students compare and contrast different vocabulary words and you just can't handle another Venn Diagram.  SFAs also work great for organizing vocabulary words into categories.  Here are two examples I created for my science and social studies classes.
Feudalism SFA
Tools Used to Study the Universe SFA

There are a number of ways students can mark the sheet.  They can write yes (y) or no (n) in each cell of the grid to indicate if the word and the feature are associated with one another.  They can use check marks and only place a check in each cell of the grid where the feature and the word are associated. My students usually prefer the check marks because the grid can get crowded and confusing with all the y's and n's.  SFAs can be used before reading to activate prior knowledge about the subject they will be reading.  During reading students can revisit the completed SFA and make adjustments.  

If you have some struggling readers in your room, here are some suggestions from Reading Rockets to differentiate the assignment:

  • Adjust the number of categories depending on the learner. Use concrete words and features for learners who have difficulty with abstract thoughts.
  • Begin with items that are fairly dissimilar and move toward using items where the differences are more subtle.
  • Follow up assignments can vary from using the information learned about one category to assignments that ask students to compare and contrast across categories.
There are also some great examples of SFAs on the Reading Rockets site.  

Saturday, March 9, 2013

These are my confessions...

Confession #1 : I actually like professional development. 
I know, I'm that annoying teacher in the PD class that gets all excited about what I'm learning and enthusiastically participates in the activities. I'm the teacher everyone wants to slap across the face.  I'm okay with that. I try to tone it down on most occasions because I know I have to work with these people everyday, but sometimes it's just so hard to keep it all in.  I'm a teacher geek and I'm proud of it! My teacher geek really comes out when learning about these topics:

Interactive Notebooks for Social Studies
Science Notebooking
Content Area Reading and Writing
Formative Assessment
Inquiry-based Science


Confession #2:  I pleasure read educational books.
 Next to my bed you won't find Fifty Shades of Grey, the Twilight Series, or any other bestsellers (at least not during the school year).  What you will find are these: 










Confession #3: I can never leave a lesson plan alone
In my eyes no lesson is ever perfect.  I spend hours on the internet looking for ideas and ways to make all my lessons more engaging, more researched based, more dynamic.  I just can't leave well enough alone.  It drives my husband crazy! 

So there they are my confessions! If you're a teacher geek too, join me won't you?  Let's make our classrooms better for our students and ourselves!